Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS Caching for Faster Browsing #9

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

DNS Caching for Faster Browsing #9

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Load any web page.
2. Wait for DNS resolution. Take a nap. (GSM/EDGE)
3. Page might be loaded by the time you wake up.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Once a hostname has been resolved by external DNS server, the proxy should
cache the resolved IP address for faster look ups.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.0.5 on Windows XP Professional 32-bit laptop
1.0.5 on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit laptop

Please provide any additional information below.
[Admin Panel - Caching Options]
file = /sdcard/proxoid-dns
dnstimeout = 86400 // number of seconds in 24 hours
dnsentries = 1000

read/write a flat file on /sdcard and make it to where the end user can
specify DNS resolution timeout and number of DNS entries in the flat file
before they get stale or pushed out.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jpy...@gmail.com on 26 Jul 2009 at 2:45

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 10 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by RedBMas...@gmail.com on 10 Feb 2010 at 3:56

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I added a memory cache that is cleaned each time proxoid is stopped.
I did not made real mesure but yes, browsing seems faster.
But I did not understand why : java should have it's own cache ... 

Original comment by mike.bar...@gmail.com on 13 Feb 2010 at 10:06

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant