VisualScript purpose might be misleading

[Xrayez]

godot-lang-support/README.md

Line 32 in 2fccfb9

VisualScript can be considered as a secondary scripting language for non-programmers or more visually-acute people. It too provides rich support.

See my comment in godotengine/godot-visual-script#38.

Compare reduz response:

Unlike Unreal, this is more meant as a complement to programmers, so game designers, level designers, etc. can work more easily.

I'm not quite sure about this statement, but I kind of doubt for this opinion to be outdated even in 2020.

The thing is that 99% of people do think VisualScript is indended for non-programmers in spite of this. So I'd just combine the two statements perhaps, because by now the community's effort is to make it easy-to-use even for non-programmers?

There are certainly engines which target "no coding required" philosophy, better than Godot IMO, of course they're more limited in comparison.

[Vivraan]

Just omitting the "non-programmers" part should do I guess.

[Vivraan]

I also added a summary of what I read in the thread you shared.

[Xrayez]

I think this should do it, closing but up for discussion of course, if you like. 🙂