Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geometric constraints #5

Closed
Alexanderisgod opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

geometric constraints #5

Alexanderisgod opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Alexanderisgod
Copy link

i view your video , it seems that your model often divides an object into two, or more, so the geometric constraints or loss designed is not perfect?
image

@Szy-Young
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Alexanderisgod, the smoothness regularization in our method clusters neighboring points into the same object, thus avoids over-segmentation. This is a simple and effective solution, while we can expect better results from more advanced designs in the future, e.g., considering graph connectivity in the point cloud.

@Alexanderisgod
Copy link
Author

Hi @Alexanderisgod, the smoothness regularization in our method clusters neighboring points into the same object, thus avoids over-segmentation. This is a simple and effective solution, while we can expect better results from more advanced designs in the future, e.g., considering graph connectivity in the point cloud.

After reading your paper, I have to say that the design of the loss function is very instructive, but the generalization of the characteristics of moving objects to stationary objects is not enough using only the change of perspective.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants