Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chocolate-doom's bash completion scripts are man pages instead #48228

Closed
Jjp137 opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

chocolate-doom's bash completion scripts are man pages instead #48228

Jjp137 opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Jjp137
Copy link
Contributor

Jjp137 commented Jan 16, 2024

Is this a new report?

Yes

System Info

Void 6.1.71_1 x86_64 GenuineIntel uptodate FFFFFFFF

Package(s) Affected

chocolate-doom-3.0.1_1

Does a report exist for this bug with the project's home (upstream) and/or another distro?

no

Expected behaviour

The /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/chocolate-{doom,heretic,hexen,strife} files should be Bash completion scripts.

Actual behaviour

The `/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/chocolate-{doom,heretic,hexen,strife}' files are man pages.

This results in unexpected behavior, such as Chocolate Doom suddenly launching, when trying to tab-complete parameters such as WAD file names.

Steps to reproduce

  1. xbps-install chocolate-doom
  2. cat /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/chocolate-{doom,heretic,hexen,strife}
  3. Notice that the output looks similar to man pages.
@Jjp137 Jjp137 added bug Something isn't working needs-testing Testing a PR or reproducing an issue needed labels Jan 16, 2024
@classabbyamp classabbyamp removed the needs-testing Testing a PR or reproducing an issue needed label Jan 16, 2024
@sgn sgn closed this as completed in e7ba52a Jan 17, 2024
@Jjp137
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jjp137 commented Feb 17, 2024

The chocolate-doom package in the Void repos is still at version 3.0.1_1, and this issue is still present when I re-download the package and install it. Shouldn't there be a newer version (such as 3.0.1_2) of the package?

(I was away from home for a while and forgot about this issue...)

@classabbyamp
Copy link
Member

4a3efcb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants