Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package request: xdg-utils 1.2.1 #50142

Closed
slatian opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Package request: xdg-utils 1.2.1 #50142

slatian opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
request Package request

Comments

@slatian
Copy link

slatian commented May 1, 2024

Package name

xdg-utils

Package homepage

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils

Description

xdg-utils 1.2.1 got quite some bugfixes compared to the 1.1.3. It will also be a requirement to upgrade to KDE Plasma 6 in the future.

The package is currently orphaned.

I'm offering to maintain the package myself, but that would put me in the double role of being a developer and package maintainer for the same project which I'd like to avoid.

Does the requested package meet the package requirements?

System

Is the requested package released?

Yes

@slatian slatian added the request Package request label May 1, 2024
@classabbyamp
Copy link
Member

Please don't request an update of a package, We have a script for that. However, a quality pull request may help.

@classabbyamp classabbyamp closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 1, 2024
@meator
Copy link
Contributor

meator commented May 3, 2024

The package is currently orphaned.

I'm offering to maintain the package myself, but that would put me in the double role of being a developer and package maintainer for the same project which I'd like to avoid.

If you're a xdg-utils contributor and you'd like to maintain its Void package, that's great! People who are intimitely familiar with the project being packaged are the best fit for a package maintainer.

It looks like there already is a PR: #50145 You can comment on it asking for the change of maintainership if you change your mind.

@classabbyamp
Copy link
Member

classabbyamp commented May 3, 2024

we would highly prefer maintainers be active void users (not those who are just upstream developers), and we would also prefer package adoptions only come from people with a history of contributions to void

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
request Package request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants