Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

glitch.com as a deployment option? #26

Open
sknebel opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

glitch.com as a deployment option? #26

sknebel opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@sknebel
Copy link

sknebel commented Jul 19, 2017

I currently have no use for this, but in case you hadn't seen it: https://glitch.com is a (free) node.js hosting thing and might be an interesting platform to run this project on. They have a button similar to the "Deploy to Heroku" one: https://remix-button.glitch.me/ Might be worth a look and test?

@voxpelli
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @sknebel! Wasn't aware of the button, will certainly look into it, sounds great 👍

@ScalaWilliam
Copy link

Glitch is nice and easy to get started with but for production stuff you have no contract/SLA.

I had a few issues with 504/503's though:

Good for experimentation/remixing/blah but there are no guarantees :)

A more durable deployment (less user friendly) target could be Lambda, it's even used for CI: https://github.com/lambci/lambci

@voxpelli
Copy link
Owner

@ScalaWilliam Thanks for the notes! Regarding Lambda, yes I agree that would be very interesting, I added #2 for that. AWS should have some similar declarative way as Heroku and Glitch, Cloudformation or something, so should be almost as easy there (not taking into consideration that the UX of AWS is slightly – um – challenging)

@voxpelli
Copy link
Owner

In regards to Cloudformation on AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/construct-your-own-launch-stack-url/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants