Nativescript-vue v-template support

[farfromrefug]

When using Vue in Nativescript we have a custom v component called v-template https://nativescript-vue.org/en/docs/utilities/v-template/
It kind of work like v-for. Kind of! the parent of the template defines a :items or a for property which is an array like object.
Then inside the template you can use item which is an object of items
Do you think you could add support for it so that we get completion on template?

Here is an example https://github.com/nativescript-vue/nativescript-vue/blob/5b6a382c39a8ce3d1782926c635abf49ebe700eb/samples/app/components/ListViewTest.vue#L8

Thanks

[yoyo930021]

Vetur support custom component data for custom framework or libs.

You need to add this:

1. Add component data files. Example: https://github.com/vuejs/vue-router/tree/dev/vetur
2. Add key in package.json. Example: https://github.com/vuejs/vue-router/blob/dev/package.json#L24

Doc: https://vuejs.github.io/vetur/component-data.html#other-frameworks

[yoyo930021]

The tricky thing here is the if prop question.
If you want to get it right type check in template interpolation, We need to requiring special handling of if prop.

[farfromrefug]

@yoyo930021 thanks ! tried that and got v-template to be "recognized. However what i would like is for vetur to "know" that item is an item of the array defined in :itemsabove the template, so that i get type and completion on theitemobject. Just like it happens withv-for`. Do you think this is possible?

[yoyo930021]

@yoyo930021 thanks ! tried that and got v-template to be "recognized. However what i would like is for vetur to "know" that item is an item of the array defined in :itemsabove the template, so that i get type and completion on theitemobject. Just like it happens withv-for`. Do you think this is possible?

This question is the same as if.
I think this is not easy to handle.
It is difficult for us to deal with this particular component.
Call @ktsn for check.

Why isn’t this API designed as a scoped slot?
This way you can avoid this problem perfectly.

[farfromrefug]

@rigor789 do you a reason not to use slots as @yoyo930021 suggests?

[yoyo930021]

PS. scoped slot type check is not support now.
We will support in the future.
But this approach can also avoid many problems.