New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please define a license #752
Comments
This should be improved. For now please see https://github.com/vxl/vxl/blob/master/core/vxl_copyright.h |
We should consider adding a LICENSE.md file at the root of the directory. |
There are files in the netlib dir that are inconsistent with the above licence. Specifically,
We are trying to get the latest version of ITK (v 5.1.0), which includes vxl in its sources, into the openSUSE distribution and our legal help flagged this (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/817960). |
I'm bumping this. Since I just ran into the issue of not having a proper LICENSE file with regards to the Fedora package. Could the (contents of the) header file not simply be copied to it's own file called I also noticed that in Fedora we remove https://github.com/vxl/vxl/blob/master/contrib/prip/vdtop/tests/lena.org.pgm, yet I'm unable to determine what the license of that file is. Does anyone know where that is documented? I'm being told it is non-free - license wise. |
I found the answer: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/license-problem-non-free-img-lenna |
Besides copyright/licensing issues, there are other good reasons find a different test image. See: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/it-s-time-to-retire-lena-from-computer-science |
Please make a pull request that provides the desired result. The development team has very few resources to research and address the issues to get this the way you desire. We would likely accept a simple file change quite quickly. |
It would be easy to add a new |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: