Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add to criteria for "Process for Including Extensions in Activity Streams 2.0"? #547

Open
2 of 5 tasks
torgo opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
2 of 5 tasks

Comments

@torgo
Copy link

torgo commented Sep 12, 2023

Please Indicate One:

  • Editorial
  • Question
  • Feedback
  • Blocking Issue
  • Non-Blocking Issue

Please Describe the Issue:

As discussed in the CG meeting today, would it make sense to add to the criteria anything around I18N, A11Y or security / privacy review? As an example, in TAG we ask people to fill in this issue template when they request a review. I'm not suggesting you need to do anything as heavy-weight as that, but something lighter weight around these topics might be appropriate.

@torgo torgo changed the title Add to criteria? Add to criteria for "Process for Including Extensions in Activity Streams 2.0"? Sep 12, 2023
@evanp
Copy link
Collaborator

evanp commented Sep 29, 2023

@torgo so, I added a section to the criteria for doing security, privacy, a11y and i18n reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants