Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WCAG 2.2 use of personalization #202

Open
rachaelbradley opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

WCAG 2.2 use of personalization #202

rachaelbradley opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
1) content module implementation Approaches to add personalization semantics to content

Comments

@rachaelbradley
Copy link

In WCAG 2.2 Visible Controls includes a future technique . Looking through the working draft of Personalization against the much updated version of visible controls, I wonder if the markup should be tied to an action. I would like an action of open menu or display menu but do not see that. Would someone review and advise on the best possible future technique based on the current state of the documents?

@matatk
Copy link
Contributor

matatk commented Feb 7, 2022

Thanks @rachaelbradley. We had time to discuss this issue very briefly on the Personalization call today, and I took an action to update this thread with our understanding of the issue and next steps. This incorporates the feedback that you (@rachaelbradley) gave @JaninaSajka and me via email on the APA chairs list.

We understand that you're suggesting that we write the proposed future technique "Indicate programmatically that a control is important (future)" and, from our email thread, it sounds like this may incorporate the data-simplification attribute, though the group will discuss this further. As part of our Candidate Recommendation (CR) stage, which is expected imminently, we will be seeking/developing implementations that would support techniques such as this.

As techniques are non-normative, this does not introduce any sort of blocking dependency between the Personalization spec and WCAG, and doesn't need to hold up CR for either of our groups.

We are keen to contribute to WCAG techniques (maybe there are more we could contribute, too) and look forward to working on this.

cc @snidersd @lwolberg @ruoxiran

@ruoxiran ruoxiran added the implementation Approaches to add personalization semantics to content label Jul 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1) content module implementation Approaches to add personalization semantics to content
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants