New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Section on Counter Styles #92
Comments
In Arabic, old books used to use the math symbols for the abjad numbers (so the ا would have a “serif”, ج or ه would be in initial form etc). Presumably because it made the symbols stand out since they are used in isolation. |
The WP hijai, is the alphabetic order in common use in Arabic. |
@khaledhosny, can you elaborate on the "use the math symbols"? Are you saying we have a "math" style for Arabic letters that, under the same type/font, would have a slightly different representation, like a "serif" for the ALEF? |
So, in terms of enumerating the alphabet, we can say, for each letter, we have a "text style" singular presentation and a "math style" one. Now, another question is how to continue counting after we've iterated over all letters. One method I remember from school was (for Persian Abjad) was this: [of course, imagine this list is RTL and right-aligned!]
Anything knows of any other methods? |
Yes.
AFAIK, it is a just a comma. I don’t know why it is drawn oversized, but that practice seems to continue to date. |
Here are two list counter styles, from Arabic books published circa 1982/1983 in Kerala, India. Observations
Source: http://www.islamicmanuscripts.info/files/Witkam-2014-Kerala-books.pdf Numbers on Arabic Number SignIn this book, the index appears on top of Arabic Number Sign, and then the list item ends with an empty circle. Circled NumbersHere, the index appears in a circle, and at goes after (left end) of the list item. See Also
|
That sign looks more like U+0614 ARABIC SIGN TAKHALLUS than U+0600 ARABIC NUMBER SIGN. |
That's interesting, @khaledhosny! It does look like the reference shape of U+0614 ARABIC SIGN TAKHALLUS, although it doesn't make sense to have that here. Do you know about the history of U+0614? |
No more information, I’m afraid, other than it is one of these Urdu symbols that were encoded together. |
I think we need a section in ALReq to cover the needs of predefined-counter-styles for Arabic script.
https://w3c.github.io/predefined-counter-styles/#arabic-styles
The table is specifically very useful, providing comparison between methods:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: