You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some states/properties reference undefined as a value however, this value is missing from their Values table:
aria-multiselectable
The Values table for aria-multiselectable does not have an entry for undefined however, the spec states that both false and undefined are valid values for this property:
The aria-current description section says "If the attribute is not present or its value is the empty string or undefined...". The value undefined is also missing from aria-current's Values tables.
Should undefined be added?
Link to the version of the specification or documentation you were looking at
Does the issue exists in the editors draft (the editors draft is the most recent draft of the specification)?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rahimabdi
added
the
editorial
a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or the repo
label
May 4, 2024
rahimabdi
changed the title
Values table for aria-multiselectable is missing "undefined"
Values table for aria-multiselectable/aria-current are missing "undefined"
May 4, 2024
Describe the change
Some states/properties reference
undefined
as a value however, this value is missing from their Values table:aria-multiselectable
The Values table for
aria-multiselectable
does not have an entry forundefined
however, the spec states that bothfalse
andundefined
are valid values for this property:aria-current
The aria-current description section says "If the attribute is not present or its value is the empty string or
undefined
...". The value undefined is also missing fromaria-current
's Values tables.Should
undefined
be added?Link to the version of the specification or documentation you were looking at
Link to documentation: https://w3c.github.io/aria/
Does the issue exists in the editors draft (the editors draft is the most recent draft of the specification)?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: