Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

editorial: Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payments #474

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

editorial: Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payments #474

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mattsaxon
Copy link
Contributor

@mattsaxon mattsaxon commented Mar 24, 2017

Some minor wording changes to make it clear that a paymentrequest may
actually process a transaction rather than just supply credentials


Preview | Diff

Some minor wording changes to make it clear that a paymentrequest may
actually process a transaction rather than just supply credentials
@mattsaxon mattsaxon changed the title Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payhments Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payments Mar 24, 2017
by the merchant to process the transaction and determine successful
fund transfer. This data is returned by the <a>payment method</a>
by the merchant to process the transaction or validate the transaction
has been processed. This data is returned by the <a>payment method</a>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please rewrite this to use active voice.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ianbjacobs ianbjacobs Mar 30, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Proposed:

An object that provides information enabling the merchant to process or validate a transaction (depending on the payment method).

@zkoch zkoch assigned zkoch and adrianba and unassigned zkoch May 10, 2017
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres changed the title Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payments editorial: Clarify wording to not imply 'pull' only payments May 15, 2017
Copy link
Member

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is editorial, I'm approving in the interest of moving this forward.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

@mattsaxon could you please rebase this?

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

this part of the spec already changed. Please send a new PR if you think it's still not clear.

ianbjacobs added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017
#474 (comment)

in light of other changes to the specification.
@ianbjacobs ianbjacobs mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2017
@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Collaborator

New pull request:
#599

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants