Some friendly editorial changes #64
Conversation
A couple of typos and suggested wording changes. Use at your discretion.
| @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ | |||
| <tr> | |||
| <td>Payment App</td> | |||
| <td>Digital Wallet, Payment Instrument </td> | |||
| <td>A piece of software to pay</td> | |||
| <td>A piece of software to manage payment methods</td> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's more than that really, no? It's either: a piece of software that does pay or returns back a payment credential to enable payment.
|
This mostly LGTM. I'm not sure about the change to the payment app definition (though in general, I agree it should probably be modified). |
| @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ | |||
| <tr> | |||
| <td>Payment Mediator</td> | |||
| <td>Digital Wallet, Payment Instrument</td> | |||
| <td>A piece of software that coordinates messages between Web apps and Payment apps</td> | |||
| <td>A piece of software that coordinates messages between sellers and Payment apps</td> | |||
| </tr> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't agree with this change. The messages are exchanged between the website and the payment app via the mediator.
|
I don't hate that. It is closer to what I think should happen, and is loose enough that many different implementation strategies could be used. |
|
+1 to @adrianhopebailie's suggested change above. |
|
@halindrome Can you update your PR to reflect the discussion here? |
Updated to reflect agreed upon wording.
|
I have updated @adrianhopebailie - however, GitHub indicates that this is an outdated diff, so perhaps it was overcome by events anyway. |
|
@halindrome LGTM - looks like it will merge fine unless I am missing something |
As per Nick's request, reapplying the agreed upon change from w3c#64.
|
Merged as e72f051 |
A couple of typos and suggested wording changes. Use at your discretion.