We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As briefly discussed with @tabatkins during CSS Day:
@property
"<length>"
<length>
Why doesn't attr() use the same way of specifying types? I.e., shouldn't we do attr(<length> em, 0px) instead of attr(length em, 0px)?
attr()
attr(<length> em, 0px)
attr(length em, 0px)
EDIT: I accidentally posted the issue template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As briefly discussed with @tabatkins during CSS Day:
@property
, we have"<length>"
, and similar.<length>
directly. (https://github.com/andruud/csswg-drafts/pull/2/files)Why doesn't
attr()
use the same way of specifying types? I.e., shouldn't we doattr(<length> em, 0px)
instead ofattr(length em, 0px)
?EDIT: I accidentally posted the issue template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: