Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[css-ui] Consider adding always-none or some such to appearance, sometimes, style that's fully controllable for controls is really very demanded. #3087

Closed
Zhang-Junzhi opened this issue Sep 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
css-ui-4 Current Work
Projects

Comments

@Zhang-Junzhi
Copy link
Contributor

Zhang-Junzhi commented Sep 9, 2018

Please consider adding always-none or some such to appearance, sometimes, fully controllable for controls is really very demanded.

Especially when in the vertical writing-mode, UI interoperablities and apperances consistency for controls alsmot have no hope among different browsers, leaving control elements unuseful in vertical writing mode.

Contenteditable div, span workarounds can be used to simulate some editable controls, but lack semantics, and are unsafe(I think currently textplain-only contenteditable is still far from being standardised), and BTW, in real world case, they are buggy in vertical writing mode in most browsers, though it's not the issue of the CSS itself.

So please consider having a way of letting designers fully control the appearance of a control.

@Zhang-Junzhi Zhang-Junzhi changed the title [css-ui] Consider adding always-none or some such to appearance, sometimes, fully controllable for controls is really very demanded. [css-ui] Consider adding always-none or some such to appearance, sometimes, style that's fully controllable for controls is really very demanded. Sep 9, 2018
@frivoal frivoal self-assigned this Sep 10, 2018
@frivoal frivoal added the css-ui-4 Current Work label Sep 10, 2018
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Sep 10, 2018

It is still somewhat unclear how strong the effect of appearance:none can be. A large investigation into what is web compatible is needed for that.

If it turns out that appearance:none has to leave some native aspects on for compatibility purposes, then some kind of appearance: none-i-really-mean-it may indeed be in order.

But at this stage, it is hard to say.

@frivoal frivoal added this to To do in appearance Dec 30, 2019
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 6, 2024

#5998 aims to tackle this.

@annevk annevk closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
css-ui-4 Current Work
Projects
appearance
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants