I think the reason we left that out was because the size, prior to clamping, is guaranteed to be at least the min-size. However, you're right that we need to floor at the min-size: because clamping by the max-size alone, without consideration of the min-size, could result in violating the min-size.
Asks to "then clamp that result by the max main size property.". Why only max and not min?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: