New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[css-text] Make references more specific #5048
Comments
@r12a Alright, sure, I'll add a section reference. But first, how about you post an updated publication? The current one is from 2012. ;) |
Well the JLREQ group has been working on it, and i'm lead to believe that they are close to publishing an update. However, it won't contain substantive changes, it will just have a few errata addressed and change the format to a respec-based, multilingual doc. So i wouldn't have thought you'd need to wait on the publication before adding the references (?) |
The correct link is this one, right? https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#appendix_2 |
This sentence is current mentioned in the description of ideograph-alpha and ideograph-numeric. I think they're mentioned in 3.2.6 d of jlreq:
Appendix B (the link provided by @frivoal) seems to be a superset of it, because it contains a table, and the amount of spacing between two adjacent characters of all character classes, including ideographs and non-ideographic letters/numerals, are in it. FWIW, in clreq, it is mentioned in § 3.2.2 Mixed Text Composition in Horizontal Writing Mode:
And § 3.2.4 Handling Western Text in Chinese Text Using Proportional Western Fonts:
|
Not sure that https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/#id209 (or the clreq references) adds more than what is already stated in css-text, but Appendix B of JLReq does have more to say. That said, it would seem more appropriate to use as a note attached to the |
Agreed. And for clreq, it's "up to one quarter of a Han character width" (i.e., flexible), instead of the 1/4em spacing as specified in |
10.2. Character Class Spacing: the text-spacing property
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/#text-spacing-property
We're writing documents in HTML, where we can point to relevant sections in documents, but these references are the equivalent of saying "Here's a book, it's in there somewhere, i'll let you figure out if you can find what i was thinking of." (literally, since i have a copy of the 400-page, published JLREQ book on my shelf.)
It's fine to keep the [JLREQ] footnote reference, but please also point to the appropriate section(s) in jlreq as well.
thank you. rant over.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: