[css-text] Line breaking should fallback to UAX14 in absence of other rules #5068
Labels
Closed Accepted as Editorial
Closed Accepted by Editor Discretion
Commenter Satisfied
Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.
css-text-3
Current Work
i18n-needs-resolution
Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
Testing Unnecessary
Memory aid - issue doesn't require tests
Tracked in DoC
Moving an old thread on the www-style list to GitHub to keep it visible. Please read that thread before replying here.
The spec defines behaviour for several UAX14 line-break classes, such as IN and PR in CJK text, and WJ, ZW, and GL in general text. But there's no recommendation in the spec (other than a note which simply says that further information can be found for all scripts in UAX14) that says that in the absence of other rules in the spec or in an implementation, then the UAX14 line-break properties should be applied as a fallback.
The i18n WG believes that recommending this (as a fallback only, like the UBA for sorting when no tailoring is available) will:
We encourage tailoring of the rules for particular contexts, and propose this only as a kind of 'safety net'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: