You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The above issue resolved that align-content wont affect the static-position of abspos children within a flexbox.
This issue tracks the same change for justify-content. Currently all browsers support this behaviour.
I've added a use-counter in Blink to determine how web compatible this change would be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(Repeating what I said about this proposal in #7596 (comment) when this was initially proposed as part of that issue):
I like this idea in theory (i.e. I like the idea of fully switching to only respect align-self / justify-self for aligning the staticpos of abspos flex children), but I'm a bit skeptical that it'll be web-compatible in the justify axis, given that:
a) all browsers currently respect justify-content for these children (and this proposal would make us stop doing that)
b) no browsers currently respect justify-self for these children (and this proposal would make us start doing that)
Each of (a) and (b) seem like they could cause webcompat problems.
Having said that: if IanK's use-counters prove it to be shippable without breaking the web, it'd be a pretty trivial change for Gecko, implementation-wise.
From: #7596
The above issue resolved that align-content wont affect the static-position of abspos children within a flexbox.
This issue tracks the same change for justify-content. Currently all browsers support this behaviour.
I've added a use-counter in Blink to determine how web compatible this change would be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: