You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This note seems more like a clarification of the general rule about any unsupported syntactic constructs which it refers to when applied to selectors, rather than a requirement, to me. But I suppose that "any at-rules, properties, ..., and other syntactic constructs" statement is clear and unambiguous enough without such clarification. Maybe this note can be simply dropped?
Why would it say "Consistent with" then? "As per" would be better. And then "must" ought to be "will" as it's a statement of fact, not a requirement (the requirement is elsewhere).
https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/selectors/#invalid has a must-level requirement in a note.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: