Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use of undefined term "verifiable timestamps" #181

Closed
selfissued opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Use of undefined term "verifiable timestamps" #181

selfissued opened this issue Jan 31, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
@yancyribbens @selfissued
Labels
Editorial Editors should update the spec then close pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections

Comments

@selfissued
Copy link
Contributor

Section 12.3 Timestamps https://w3c.github.io/did-core/#timestamps opens with a use of the term "verifiable timestamps" but doesn't say what those are, what their properties are, or why their use would be beneficial. Please define this term and explain what its significance is.
@rhiaro rhiaro added the Editorial Editors should update the spec then close label Feb 4, 2020
@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Mar 17, 2020 •
edited

See also:

@selfissued
Copy link
Contributor Author

Someone who understands the intent of the term should add a definition.

@yancyribbens
Copy link
Contributor

The URL in the paragraph is outdated and is now here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0113.mediawiki.

@yancyribbens yancyribbens mentioned this issue Mar 17, 2020
Merged
@kdenhartog kdenhartog mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2020
Closed
@yancyribbens
Copy link
Contributor

This one can be assigned to me to complete.

@yancyribbens yancyribbens mentioned this issue May 5, 2020
Merged
@peacekeeper peacekeeper added the PR exists There is an open PR to address this issue label May 12, 2020
@rhiaro rhiaro added pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections and removed PR exists There is an open PR to address this issue labels May 19, 2020
@kdenhartog
Copy link
Member

closing this. Looks like we've had a PR address @selfissued original concerns and it's been labeled as pending close for a week now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yancyribbens yancyribbens

@selfissued selfissued

Labels
Editorial Editors should update the spec then close pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@peacekeeper @rhiaro @yancyribbens @selfissued @OR13 @kdenhartog