Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronize DID role terminology between Use Cases and Core specs #10

Closed
selfissued opened this issue Oct 29, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@selfissued
Copy link

Section 2 of the Use Cases (What can you do with a DID?) defines three entities for working with DIDs: The Controller, the Relying Party, and the Subject. This seems highly related to w3c/did-core#4 - which is about defining terms for three DID roles.

The terms for these roles should be kept in sync between the specifications as they evolve.

@jandrieu jandrieu self-assigned this Nov 5, 2019
@philarcher
Copy link
Collaborator

As discussed by the WG 2019-11-12 there will be a single terms document that will be included automatically in both the UCR and the Core spec (and maybe other docs). The FPWD, however, will use a snapshot that highlights this future state and the current open issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants