Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Categorisation of data subjects based on jurisdiction e.g. citizens or location for GDPR #5

Closed
coolharsh55 opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
concepts add/edit concepts in DPV vocabs question Further information is requested review Review and close/update issue

Comments

@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator

| Migrated ISSUE-6: Should our taxonomy include a distinction/modeling of data subjects to whom gdpr applies (eu citizens and/or located in eu)

State: RAISED
Opened on: 2018-12-04

Related Emails:

  1. +[minutes] 2019-10-15 dpvcg (from bert@w3.org on 2019-10-15)
  2. +ISSUE-6: Should our taxonomy include a distinction/modeling of data subjects to whom gdpr applies (eu citizens and/or locatedin eu) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2018-12-04)

Related notes:

  1. in the context of ISSUE-6 is “non-applicable citizens only” a “legal ground”? - Axel Polleres, 4 Dec 2018, 10:07:55
  2. related to ACTION-93 - Axel Polleres, 5 Apr 2019, 13:21:00
  3. RESOLVED: We leave the further specification of specific subclasses of DataSubjects out of scope of the current CG, the spec provides just one example, dpv:Child that could serve as an illustration for other subclasses affecting certain groups of DataSubjects (e.g. Citizens of certain states to which a particular legislation applies, etc.) with this rationale we postpone ISSUE-6. - Axel Polleres, 15 Oct 2019, 14:47:37
@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 added the concepts add/edit concepts in DPV vocabs label Jun 24, 2021
@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There is a proposal tabled for data subject categories - this issue will be updated based on the progress of that.

@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Data Subject categories relevant for this issue have been added to DPV v0.6 - see https://w3id.org/dpv#vocab-entities-datasubject These include concepts such as Citizens, Consumers, Clients, etc. which should cover most of applicability criteria. Note that secondary information would still need to be modeled e.g. citizen of what/where, consumer of what, and so on. Currently, such information is not within the scope of the group, with a general suggestion to model it as concepts with description e.g. EUCitizens as a subclass / sub-concept of Citizen. This issue will be kept open for inviting discussion.

@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 added question Further information is requested review Review and close/update issue labels Jun 9, 2022
@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 added this to the DPV v1 milestone Jun 30, 2022
@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Adding a note to the above comment regarding modelling specifics of data subject categories. For those tied to locations or jurisdictions, the DPV-LEGAL concepts can be used. For example, EUCitizens as a subtype/instance of dpv:DataSubject and using dpv:hasLocation legal:EU to indicate the relevance to EU as its location or basis.

@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 removed this from the DPV v1 milestone Jul 1, 2022
@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If there are no further developments for this, I will mark this as resolved on OCT-15.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
concepts add/edit concepts in DPV vocabs question Further information is requested review Review and close/update issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant