Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Requesting addition of an Accessibility Considerations section #1358

Closed
becka11y opened this issue Apr 28, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Requesting addition of an Accessibility Considerations section #1358

becka11y opened this issue Apr 28, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
a11y-tracker Group bringing to attention of a11y, or tracked by the a11y Group but not needing response. dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG
Milestone

Comments

@becka11y
Copy link

An accessibility review of Data Catalog Vocabulary (Version 3) was requested of the APA as part of our role in performing horizontal review of W3C documents for accessibility concerns.

It was reviewed by APA member Paul Grenier who made the following comments that were approved by the working group. We are requesting the addition of an Accessibility Considerations section.

  1. The addition of an Accessibility Considerations section at the same level of Security and Privacy can help increase awareness of accessibility issues in data.
  2. In an Accessibility Considerations section, I'd like to see a recommendation to, when possible, enforce alternative text for non-text data resources through the DCAT profile mechanisms or systems supporting the creation and editing of such data. This will help applications using the data to conform to WCAG 1.1 Text Alternatives (https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv.html).
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added dcat feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG labels Apr 28, 2021
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to To do in DCAT Sprint: Feedback via automation Apr 28, 2021
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to the DCAT3 3PWD milestone Apr 28, 2021
@becka11y becka11y added the a11y-tracker Group bringing to attention of a11y, or tracked by the a11y Group but not needing response. label Apr 28, 2021
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your suggestions, @becka11y.

We have discussed your request during the last dcat subgroup meeting (see meeting minutes [1]). Could you please take a look and provide feedback about the early drafted accessibility section available in [2].
Would a section like the one drafted go in the expected direction? Is there anything else you were expecting us to include?

If the drafted section does not go in the wished direction, please consider providing examples of other accessibility sections appearing in w3c rec or any other reference from which we can take inspiration.

Thanks a lot,

[1] https://www.w3.org/2021/05/26-dxwgdcat-minutes#t03
[2] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-issue-1358/dcat/index.html#accessibility

@riccardoAlbertoni riccardoAlbertoni added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Aug 27, 2021
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

We have merged PR #1373 into the editorial draft.
Thus the accessibility section is now available at the link [2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#accessibility.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

Closing the issue as discussed in the latest plenary teleconference, see https://www.w3.org/2021/09/07-dxwg-minutes#t02 .

DCAT Sprint: Feedback automation moved this from To do to Done Sep 8, 2021
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

Discussed in APA yesterday: https://www.w3.org/2021/09/22-apa-minutes.html#t06

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a11y-tracker Group bringing to attention of a11y, or tracked by the a11y Group but not needing response. dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days feedback Issues stemming from external feedback to the WG
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants