Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with example file #1479

Closed
agbeltran opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1480
Closed

Issue with example file #1479

agbeltran opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1480

Comments

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member

This file provided as an example for DCAT2:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/dcat/examples/dryad-globtherm-sdata.ttl
has the same problems fixed in #1474 for the same file in the folder /examples/vocab-dcat-3

Can we fix directly or do we need to consider some errata given that is for DCAT2?

I note that the spec points to the file directly, see https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#dataset-publication

@agbeltran
Copy link
Member Author

By the way, the example text in the spec seems ok (without prefixes, but that's what we do for other examples too)

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

By the way, the example text in the spec seems ok (without prefixes, but that's what we do for other examples too)

I wouldn't then include any errata - these are supposed to be about what is in the spec.

@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to the DCAT3 4PWD milestone Mar 16, 2022
@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to To do in DCAT Sprint: Editorial revisions via automation Mar 16, 2022
@agbeltran
Copy link
Member Author

yes, thanks, the link to the file won't change as it is pointing to the github.io site (https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/examples/dryad-globtherm-sdata.ttl)

DCAT Sprint: Editorial revisions automation moved this from To do to Done Mar 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants