Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Loading FHIR instance data into Protege. Do we need an owl:Ontology declaration in the FHIR instance data? #22

Closed
dbooth-boston opened this issue Mar 22, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Loading FHIR instance data into Protege. Do we need an owl:Ontology declaration in the FHIR instance data? #22

dbooth-boston opened this issue Mar 22, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Contributor

Tony is concerned about being able to open FHIR RDF instance data in Protege. Others are pushing back on including an owl:Ontology declaration in the instance data. Some discussion: https://www.w3.org/2016/03/22-hcls-minutes.html#item01
@dbooth-boston
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this, under the belief that it is not needed, per Eric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dbooth-boston