Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create normative requirements for allowed descendants of explicit ARIA roles #362

Open
scottaohara opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

scottaohara commented Oct 8, 2021

Presently section four, allowed descendant of ARIA roles, is marked as non-normative.

The next version of ARIA in HTML will be revising this section to create both normative and non-normative sub-sections. Things we should keep / expand upon:

  • Examples of non-conforming descendants with explanations as to why.
  • more clearly calling out explicit roles and their specific restrictions - 'whys' would be covered in related examples.
  • making a parallel to the kinds of content different ARIA roles represent should remain, but downplayed in comparison to the normative requirements.
  • if possible we should make reference to the role categorizations that the ARIA spec has already defined (widget, doc structure, landmark, live regions, and window roles)
@scottaohara
Copy link
Member Author

another example we talked about today would be ensuring this section covered the following:

<button>
  <span role=article>...</article>
</button>

or

<p>
  <span role=article>...</article>
</p>

etc

@scottaohara scottaohara changed the title Create normative requirements for section 4 Create normative requirements for allowed descendants of ARIA roles Mar 12, 2022
@scottaohara scottaohara changed the title Create normative requirements for allowed descendants of ARIA roles Create normative requirements for allowed descendants of explicit ARIA roles Mar 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants