Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allowances for proposed search element #371

Closed
scottaohara opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #401
Closed

Allowances for proposed search element #371

scottaohara opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #401
Labels
Allowed aria-* attributes Allowed roles Pertaining to the allowed roles of HTML elements blocked An issue that cannot be resolved due to other external requirements New HTML Element

Comments

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member

Under the assumption that HTML will eventually merge the proposed search element into the spec, we would need to also provide role and aria-* attribute allowances.

I have some initial thoughts, but am creating this issue as a TODO and to let other people weigh in, if they so choose.

@scottaohara scottaohara added Allowed roles Pertaining to the allowed roles of HTML elements Allowed aria-* attributes New HTML Element labels Nov 9, 2021
@scottaohara scottaohara added the blocked An issue that cannot be resolved due to other external requirements label Jan 16, 2022
@domenic
Copy link

domenic commented Feb 4, 2022

It would be great if we had a PR ready for this on html-aria (and html-aaam) before we landed whatwg/html#7320. Let me know if I can help!

@scottaohara
Copy link
Member Author

@domenic PR is made. I can merge this whenever the time is right.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Allowed aria-* attributes Allowed roles Pertaining to the allowed roles of HTML elements blocked An issue that cannot be resolved due to other external requirements New HTML Element
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants