Consider adding 'ruby-align' as a supported CSS property #265 #15
Labels
cg:texttracks
https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/texttracks
i:inline_notes
Inline notes & annotations
needs-resolution
i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction.
s:webvtt
https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/
spec-type-issue
Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label.
t:typ_ruby
8.5 Ruby text annotations
wg:timed-text
https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/timed-text
§ w3c/webvtt#265
Raised by:Richard Ishida
Opened on:2015-11-16
https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/#selectordef-cue
We have an align cue setting which sets 'text-align' on the root element, and we don't allow setting 'text-align' with ::cue or ::cue(), but I don't see any problem with allowing 'ruby-align'. It doesn't affect the size of the ruby box, and you might want different alignment for the whole cue vs. ruby. For instance, if a cue contains a single ruby annotation and the cue is start-aligned, it could make sense to start-align the ruby as well. But if a cue contains a normal run of text and has some ruby annotations here and there, it might make more sense to use the default space-around ruby alignment regardless of the cue's alignment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: