Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we allow more overhang for Chinese? #342

Closed
r12a opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Should we allow more overhang for Chinese? #342

r12a opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here i:inline_notes Inline notes & annotations s:ttml https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/ spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label.

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 15, 2017

w3c/ttml2#261

@r12a r12a added pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. s:ttml https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/ and removed pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. labels Feb 15, 2017
@r12a r12a added the close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here label May 11, 2017
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented May 11, 2017

No feedback from clreq or cjk folks. punctuation has been added to the default for Chinese.

I suppose we can close this, then.

@r12a r12a added han i:inline_notes Inline notes & annotations spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label. labels Jul 24, 2017
@r12a r12a closed this as completed Aug 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here i:inline_notes Inline notes & annotations s:ttml https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/ spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant