Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

i18n-ISSUE-471: identify time zone dependent vs. independent cases #80

Closed
r12a opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

i18n-ISSUE-471: identify time zone dependent vs. independent cases #80

r12a opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
agreed-to-close-during-mtg i18n group has discussed and resolved to close, typically in telecon close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. s:web-payments-use-cases

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Mar 16, 2016

https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=I18N-ISSUE-471&list=public-webpayments-comments

Raised by:Addison Phillips
Opened on:2015-05-15

http://www.w3.org/TR/web-payments-use-cases/

As a general observation, some of the use cases contain time-bound elements. These can be limits on things like refunds or payments, such as 6.3.4. which might be tied to a specific time zone (so that you know the specific end time local to a specific location--since "May 15, 2015" ends at different times in different places). Others may be zone independent. Care should be used to identify cases that have a time zone dependence. See also:

http://www.org/TR/timezones
@r12a r12a added the needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. label Nov 16, 2018
@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Mar 9, 2020

The Web Commerce IG (successor of Web Payments IG) was closed. Should we close this issue?

@xfq xfq added the close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here label Mar 9, 2020
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Mar 16, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Here's the request to retire the document: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/webreq/2018Jul/0021.html

@ianbjacobs will follow up on the request to retire the doc. So +1 to close.

@r12a r12a added the agreed-to-close-during-mtg i18n group has discussed and resolved to close, typically in telecon label Mar 19, 2020
@r12a r12a closed this as completed Mar 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
agreed-to-close-during-mtg i18n group has discussed and resolved to close, typically in telecon close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. s:web-payments-use-cases
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@xfq @r12a