Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[css-fonts] The Cursive = Chinese Kaiti equivalent #843

Closed
xfq opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

[css-fonts] The Cursive = Chinese Kaiti equivalent #843

xfq opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here clreq i:font-style Letterform slopes, weights, & italics i:fonts Fonts & font styles jlreq s:css-fonts https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/ tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. wg:css https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/css

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Jan 24, 2020

This is a tracker issue. Only discuss things here if they are i18n WG internal meta-discussions about the issue. Contribute to the actual discussion at the following link:

§ w3c/csswg-drafts#4606
@xfq xfq added tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. s:css-fonts https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/ i:fonts Fonts & font styles jlreq clreq labels Jan 24, 2020
@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Jan 24, 2020

Adding jlreq label as well (since 楷書体 is also used in Japan).

@xfq xfq added the i:font-style Letterform slopes, weights, & italics label Jan 24, 2020
@himorin
Copy link
Contributor

himorin commented Feb 5, 2020

short summary: Chinese font Kaiti should be categorized as Cursive as https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#cursive-def

@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Feb 6, 2020

Kai is already categorized as cursive in CSS now (see spec and test). This issue is about whether that is correct.

@upsuper
Copy link
Member

upsuper commented Feb 16, 2020

@xfq I think it's worth discussing in the next CLReq editor meeting.

cc @bobbytung

@xfq
Copy link
Member Author

xfq commented Feb 16, 2020

@upsuper OK. Will add it to the agenda.

@w3cbot w3cbot added the close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here label Nov 22, 2023
@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

The parent issue is closed. w3c/clreq#587 may track this further. I'm going to close this, but @xfq should reopen if we're not satisfied.

@w3cbot w3cbot added the wg:css https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/css label Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here clreq i:font-style Letterform slopes, weights, & italics i:fonts Fonts & font styles jlreq s:css-fonts https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/ tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. wg:css https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/css
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@aphillips @upsuper @xfq @himorin @w3cbot