You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why call out this particular possible way to create regions that are positioned partly outside the root container region? There are other permutations too, such as specifying an extent that is wider or taller than 100%, which we do not call out with a note.
I don't really mind an informative note, just a really tiny bit concerned that it might be misread as an enumeration of all the things that are prohibited, rather than only a single example.
I don't really mind an informative note, just a really tiny bit concerned that it might be misread as an
enumeration of all the things that are prohibited, rather than only a single example.
I think it's the other way around though, in that the third note you reference just describes a result of the normative requirement, whereas adding a note about a particular set of values that is prohibited by the normative requirement, without being exhaustive, feels like a step too far for me.
Is this an external request? If it's wide review feedback I would like to know more about the reason for it. Otherwise I would say take no action and close this issue. Happy to hear other views of course.
... since regions must be within the root container region
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: