-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SVG should not require <style type> #46
Comments
Note that as an alternative, you can use https://validator.w3.org/nu/ for checking SVG documents. You can give that the URL for an SVG document to check, or upload an As far as the legacy https://validator.w3.org/ markup validator, at this point, there’s basically nobody working on it any longer — not even for bug fixes. These days all the active work is on the https://validator.w3.org/nu/ checker, and that work takes place in the https://github.com/validator/validator repo. The SVG checking there is kept more up to date, and it has a number of bug fixes for SVG checking which the legacy markup validator doesn’t have. |
Oh, thanks, I hadn't realized! Perhaps it would help to add a clear "recommend you go here instead" link to the nu validator from https://validator.w3.org/? (It is available indirectly via the "other validators and tools" link.) It's pretty common to end up here via Google search or those of us who remember this URL by heart... |
Yeah, I will make time to get something like that added to https://validator.w3.org/ (Actually it’s probably time that we finally just take the https://validator.w3.org/nu/ UI and backend and move it to https://validator.w3.org/ — and then move what’s currently at https://validator.w3.org/ to become https://validator.w3.org/legacy/ or such. That’s a bigger deal to make happen, and I’ve been lazy about even making time to start the necessary internal conversations. But I guess it’s time I quit procrastinating on it…) |
Any update on this @sideshowbarker? I had to jump through many issues and pull requests to find these comments that the validator is basically a deprecated legacy validator. I think it would be a good idea to just add one simple sentence to the live website at https://validator.w3.org/ explaining this, and linking to https://validator.w3.org/nu/. I'm also curious how https://validator.w3.org/nu/ compares to https://validator.nu/. I've read the About pages on both sites and can't really make sense of it. What are the differences? |
The following document produces an error, but I believe it shouldn't.
The SVG 1.1 spec says the following:
So it seems that SVG 1.1 has a default
<style type>
, so there shouldn't be an error in this case.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: