Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Success Criterion 1.4.2 - Audio Control - Level A #27

Open
JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Success Criterion 1.4.2 - Audio Control - Level A #27

JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@JJdeGroot
Copy link
Member

JJdeGroot commented Jul 10, 2024

MATF meeting on July 17, 2024

Source

Independent from system volume? Super weird

I would say we should follow the current WCAG structure - otherwise we could rewrite a lot of the success criteria.

JJ; There is some overlap, but this is under perceivable and focused specifically on audio, as opposed to operable and more general

+1 Mick

+1 to Mick

JJ: What about Splash screens?

I see (hear) it on spa and salon websites a lot still in the US

Chromium and other browsers have the ability to mute now, but that would fall under UAAG IMO

Jamie: Do we need to discuss this, what do we need to change

Tori: Building on what Jamie said - a lot of these are general - these are the areas that are fairly agnostic

+1 to Tori,, and we need an actionable item from Agendum 2

JJ agrees

I do feel that since phones have a dedicated rocker for volume that it should respect the user settings

Jamie: Can we add action items for agenda 1 + 2 to take ownership for 1.4.1 and 1.4.2?

ACTION: Create subgroup to discuss 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 within the Github repo

move to previous agendum

WCAG2ICT guidance: https://w3c.github.io/wcag2ict/#audio-control

Share your thoughts for applying to mobile apps as a comment below.

@JJdeGroot JJdeGroot added this to the Level A milestone Jul 10, 2024
@qbalsdon
Copy link

The only thing I would like to discuss here is why 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide can't cover this criterion? I'm nothing if not redundant, but it seems a bit odd.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants