Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need to be clear how future extensions add new constraints #148

Closed
fluffy opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Need to be clear how future extensions add new constraints #148

fluffy opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@fluffy
Copy link
Contributor

fluffy commented Mar 19, 2015

No description provided.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

isn't this something for the IANA registry?

@jan-ivar
Copy link
Member

Future specifications would presumably use partial dictionaries for their WebIDL, and would need to do so for all four of the dictionaries we just introduced. If we folded the four dictionaries into one then just one partial dictionary would do.

@stefhak
Copy link
Contributor

stefhak commented Mar 23, 2015

I think this was addressed by #150 which was just merged, so I close this Issue.

@stefhak stefhak closed this as completed Mar 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@dontcallmedom @fluffy @stefhak @jan-ivar