Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

CFC: Move Microdata to FPWD #7

Closed
LJWatson opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

CFC: Move Microdata to FPWD #7

LJWatson opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@LJWatson
Copy link

LJWatson commented Apr 6, 2017

This Call For Consensus (CFC) is to move the ccurrent Microdata Editors Draft (ED) to First Public Working Draft (FPWD).

Changes between the 2013 W3C Note and the current ED:

  • Remove DOM API. This API has been removed from browsers that did implement it.
  • Remove unused references.

Please respond to this CFC by the end of day on Monday 17 April 2017. Positive responses are encouraged, in the form of a +1 or -1 on this thread, or by posting a message to public-webapps@w3.org. Silence will be taken as consent with the proposal to move to a FPWD.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 6, 2017

There seems to be some editorial problem. The table of content of the ED indeed does not include the section on the DOM API, but the text itself does.

(The TOC refers to section 6 for the conversion to other formats; in the text section 6 is the DOM API, and section 7 is the conversion section...)

@chaals
Copy link
Collaborator

chaals commented Apr 7, 2017

@iherman wrote

There seems to be some editorial problem. The table of content of the ED indeed does not include the section on the DOM API, but the text itself does.

That is a problem indeed. I'll fix it later today and request that we reset the CfC.

My apologies...

@chaals chaals closed this as completed Apr 7, 2017
@LJWatson LJWatson mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2017
@LJWatson
Copy link
Author

LJWatson commented Apr 7, 2017

The ToC has been fixed. Re-opening this CFC with an extended deadline.

@LJWatson LJWatson reopened this Apr 7, 2017
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 7, 2017

+1 (both to the original CFC, and the changes of @chaals)

@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Apr 12, 2017

-1 (will update with more comments)
tl;dr: is legacy, waste of W3C resources (CR, test suite etc.), relitigates already resolved issue from previous HTMLWG, and lastly wastes time duplicating yet another WHATWG spec.

Compromise: Ok to update existing W3C Microdata NOTE instead, with dropping DOM APIs etc.

@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Apr 17, 2017

+1 including above fix

@LJWatson
Copy link
Author

Thanks for taking time to respond @tantek.

Your concerns naturally echo those raised by Mozilla during the WebPlat charter review. At the time it was noted that Microdata is supported by multiple major search engines - two of which, Yandex and Google, have offered editors - and that
it is used on a substantial percentage of sites on the web.

The W3C has already chartered WebPlat to move Microdata onto the Rec track. Your objection asks us to ignore the AC and our charter, but that is not something we can do.

@w3c w3c locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 18, 2017
@chaals
Copy link
Collaborator

chaals commented May 8, 2017

The FPWD was published on May 4

@chaals chaals closed this as completed May 8, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants