Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ICC profile contents are ignored, magic string used for labelling #3

Closed
svgeesus opened this issue May 18, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@svgeesus
Copy link

commented May 18, 2017

I expected to be able to give a quick and positive review of this specification.

However, having done a review of this proposed specification I have severe issues with the approach taken. Before reporting them here, I have asked the Color on the Web CG to check my findings, because I might be wrong. If so i will retract this issue.

Meanwhile, please do not publish this specification.

@svgeesus svgeesus added the bug label May 18, 2017

@nigelmegitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

Thank you for this @svgeesus - as Chair I have rescinded the decision to publish, pending resolution of this issue.

@palemieux

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

@nigelmegitt It sounds like @svgeesus and others have requested an extension to file concrete tickets. What is the new deadline? It is only fair to other potential commenters and to users.

@nigelmegitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

Actually I was responding to the request not to publish, not a request for an extension to file new tickets. We cannot set a new deadline for a revised version until we have resolved the issue.

@palemieux

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

@nigelmegitt I was referring specifically to Before reporting them here. It is unreasonable to have an unbounded amount of time to do so.

@nigelmegitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

@palemieux On the other hand it is also clear that we should not publish what we have now. I'm sure @svgeesus will seek timely feedback, or if he does not receive it then raise his issues here regardless. I would hope that "timely" here is around 1 week - @svgeesus does that seem feasible?

@palemieux

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 19, 2017

On the other hand it is also clear that we should not publish what we have now.

Indeed!

@nigelmegitt

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 22, 2017

For those interested in where the review discussion is happening, it is publicly visible in the thread beginning at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-colorweb/2017May/0001.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.