Policy Composition & Vocab

[simonstey]

According to http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#composition:

A Policy MAY also contain Assets, Parties, and Actions at the Policy level, and these entities apply to all of the enclosing Rules in the Policy.

example 21:

{
    "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl.jsonld",
    "@type": "Policy",
    "uid": "http://example.com/policy:8888",
    "target": "http://example.com/music/1999.mp3",
    "assigner": "http://example.com/org/sony-music",
    "action": "play",
    "permission": [{
        "assignee": "http://example.com/people/billie"
        },
        {
        "assignee": "http://example.com/people/murphy"
        }]
}  

however, e.g. http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-target defines only Rule as its domain

=> http://example.com/policy:8888 is both Policy and Rule?

[riannella]

Update the Ontology?

[vroddon]

Implemented in Revision: 316555b
Four properties (action, target, assigner, assignee) have changed their domain to:

	rdfs:domain [
		a owl:Class ;
		owl:unionOf ( :Rule :Policy ) ;
	] ;

[simonstey]

Four properties (action, target, assigner, assignee) have changed their domain to:

what about their super-properties?

[vroddon]

Good point. I implemented the same for :funcion and :relation
Revision: 2ee14f6