Duplicates in Vocabulary

[simonstey]

While skimming through the current Vocab draft for issue #194, I noticed that "constraint operators" are listed twice:

Once as part of the Core Vocab in 3.14 Constraint Operators:

3.14.1 Or
3.14.2 Exclusive Or
3.14.3 And
3.14.4 And Sequence

and once as part of the Common Vocab in 4.6 Constraint Operators:

4.6.1 Equal to
4.6.2 Greater than
4.6.3 Greater than or equal to
4.6.4 Less than
4.6.5 Less than or equal to
4.6.6 Not equal to
4.6.7 Is a
4.6.8 Has part
4.6.9 Is part of
4.6.10 Is all of
4.6.11 Is any of
4.6.12 Is none of
4.6.13 Or
4.6.14 Exclusive Or
4.6.15 And
4.6.16 And Sequence

1. why does the core vocab only include the logical operators but not the relational ones?
2. why are the logical operators mentioned twice?
3. if we keep the nonnormative common vocab of ODRL in the same document as the normative core vocab, we should avoid having duplicate names like 3.14 Constraint Operators and 4.6 Constraint Operators

(I know that this list is auto-generated)

[riannella]

1. Main reason was that the logical ones are all explicitly mentioned in 2.6.2 Compound Constraint.
   We can do the same in 2.6.1 Atomic Constraint and perhaps explicitly list the operators we thing should be core:

• eq

Any others??

2. Copy/paste error (now fixed)

3. We can prefix all the sub-section headings in Section 4 with "Common..." ??

[simonstey]

We can do the same in 2.6.1 Atomic Constraint and perhaps explicitly list the operators we thing should be core:

In the Vocab, I would split the operators into logical operators and relational ones and simply link from the IM to the respective sections in the vocab.

[riannella]

Yes, but are all the operators in the Vocab in "Core" ?

[riannella]

See outcome of #206 issue

[riannella]

Created relational and logical sets (and added to Core vocab)

commit: effcc01