Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation properties #7

Closed
riannella opened this issue Jun 17, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@riannella
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 17, 2016

We currently use rdfs:comment to capture both the definition and comment from the original ODRL Vocabulary spec.
I propose we now use:
skos:definition for the definition
skos:scopeNote for the comments

@riannella riannella added this to the Vocabulary & Expression milestone Jun 17, 2016

@nitmws

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 20, 2016

We have to be aware that skos:scopeNote is one of many kinds of SKOS notes (https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-skos-primer-20090818/#secdocumentation). Unfortunately it is not exactly defined but I infer its focus is on describing the scope of use of a term. In this case we would have to check if the content of comments is really about that - else we should use the generic skos:note.

@riannella

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jun 21, 2016

Ok, what if we used rdfs:comment for "comments" and skos:definition for "definitions" ?

@riannella

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jul 5, 2016

Add all the definitions+comments from the original Vocab spec into skos:definition and rdfd:comments

@riannella

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jul 12, 2016

Completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.