You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we agreed to merge PR #489 which created W3C Statements, we did not have a firm conclusion on what they should be called, and when with W3C Statements as a provisional term, expecting to discuss some more whether that was the right word do use. Is it?
I think the name we landed on "W3C Statements" is fine, and I'd like to close with no change. Either way, if we want to change, the time is now, before we roll out the new process, so agenda+
frivoal
added
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
and removed
Agenda+
Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
labels
May 12, 2021
When we agreed to merge PR #489 which created W3C Statements, we did not have a firm conclusion on what they should be called, and when with W3C Statements as a provisional term, expecting to discuss some more whether that was the right word do use. Is it?
Previously mentioned alternatives (from #461):
Their pros and cons have been subject to discussion in #461 already.
Any body has a better idea?
Personally, I'm fine with things as they are, and I am not particularly looking for change, but we said we'd discuss, so here's an issue for doing so.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: