Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[simple-ruby] Group ruby exceptional cases #3

Closed
r12a opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by w3c/jlreq#205
Closed

[simple-ruby] Group ruby exceptional cases #3

r12a opened this issue Feb 13, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by w3c/jlreq#205

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 13, 2019

3.3 Placement of group-ruby (final note)
https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/docs/simple-ruby/#placement-of-group-ruby-0

As group-ruby is treated as a unit, there is no wrap opportunity. However, in some exceptional cases where it is wrapped, and is then processed similarly to jukugo-ruby.

Since this document is about ways to automate ruby handling on the Web, this text is problematic. Without understanding what the exceptional cases are you can't decide to process similarly to jukugo-ruby.

Can we either add text to say that this is just additional information that doesn't need to be actioned, or specify what those cases are?
frivoal referenced this issue in frivoal/jlreq Apr 3, 2020
@frivoal
Fix translation of the note associated with figure 15
2f06f0d 
The original translation was problematic and not particularly faithful to
the original Japanese text, causing confusion and misunderstanding. This
should clear things up.

Closes #26
Closes #194
frivoal referenced this issue in w3c/jlreq Apr 3, 2020
@frivoal
Fix translation of the note associated with figure 15 (#205)
a54ef23 
The original translation was problematic and not particularly faithful to
the original Japanese text, causing confusion and misunderstanding. This
should clear things up.

Closes #26
Closes #194
@r12a r12a transferred this issue from w3c/jlreq Apr 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix translation of the note associated with figure 15 frivoal/jlreq
1 participant
@r12a