Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce fingerprinting related to Web payments #176

Open
ianbjacobs opened this issue Apr 26, 2019 · 9 comments
Open

Reduce fingerprinting related to Web payments #176

ianbjacobs opened this issue Apr 26, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@ianbjacobs
Copy link

Hi all,

Can we find ways to reduce (JavaScript in particular) fingerprinting? Should we have a workshop on this?

Ian

@samuelweiler
Copy link
Member

samuelweiler commented May 3, 2019

The Privacy IG (PING) is looking at ways to reduce fingerprinting surface. We're starting with font enumeration. I encourage joining PING.

Workshopping would be good once we collect a motivated group of people. Who do you think should be involved?

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

I want to note that the Web Payment Security IG is holding conversations on this topic.

@ianbjacobs ianbjacobs changed the title Reduce fingerprinting on the Web Reduce fingerprinting related to Web payments Oct 22, 2019
@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

I've narrowed the focus of this particular issue to Web payments (e.g., 3-D Secure and risk assessment)

@ianbjacobs ianbjacobs moved this from Exploration to Investigation in Strategy Team's Incubation Pipeline (Funnel) Oct 22, 2019
@samuelweiler
Copy link
Member

There were some interesting discussions about this at the WPSIG mtg at TPAC2019. Fingerprinting, more generally, was discussed in an invite-only workshop in early September 2019.

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

WPSIG and PING have begun conversations about how emerging technologies (e.g., trust tokens, EATs, token binding, and possibly others) could help address this issue.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

Secure Payment Confirmation seems to be the proposed approach to this need - it probably ought to be considered in incubation or evaluation at this stage

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

SPC might play a role here, but it is not yet clear that it will in the following sense:

  • In the case of 3DS, I think the main usage of SPC will be during the "challenge flow," which means after a data-gathering phase.
  • Independently we are interested in understanding "what is the account identifier for this user?" which is typically stored in a cookie today. We have been having discussions about how to get an answer to this question with user consent through a streamlined UX.

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

A new AntiFraud CG may contribute to progress on this.
https://www.w3.org/community/antifraud/

@ianbjacobs
Copy link
Author

The Antifraud CG will discuss some of its emerging proposals [1] at TPAC 2022 in a joint meeting with WPWG, WPSIG, and WebAuthn.

[1] https://github.com/antifraudcg/proposals/issues

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@dontcallmedom @ianbjacobs @samuelweiler and others