Charter proposal: Decentralized Identifier Working Group Charter #281
Labels
Comments
|
No comments from APA, over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review. |
|
Can we issue an advanced notice? Actually, is this a requirement for a maintenance WG? |
|
we should send an advance notice indeed. @wseltzer ? |
|
Sure, now that there's something to point at, please send the advance notice @iherman |
Done, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/team-strat/2021Aug/0005.html |
|
No comment/request from i18n. |
|
No security or privacy issues. |
|
APA would like to draw attention to recent updates to https://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/. There are issues filed on this on which APA would like to collaborate with DID. |
plehegar
moved this from Chartering
to Strategy Work Concluded
in Strategy Team's Incubation Pipeline (Funnel)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review: Decentralized Identifier Working Group Charter
Charter: https://w3c.github.io/did-wg-charter/
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Diff from previous charter. But the diff does not really make sense in this case. The previous (ie, current) charter is: https://www.w3.org/2020/12/did-wg-charter.html.
Issues at:
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
n/a
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
None
cc: @brentzundel @msporny @burnburn
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: