-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ig/me] Media and Entertainment Interest Group rechartering #378
Comments
editorial: latest two entry (except one line for this) in history table has wrong link? |
No comment nor request from i18n |
From APA: We approve the MEIG charter. We filed a separate issue on the MEIG repo which also proposes a liaison between our groups. For convenience, here's a quote of that issue, filed by @JaninaSajka...
|
No comments except Thank you for doing a good job on this charter +1 to send to the AC once horizontal review is complete |
Thank you @svgeesus. We have updated the charter to describe the expected collaboration with APA WG, as suggested by @JaninaSajka and @matatk. |
Some links need to be updated. See w3c/media-and-entertainment#104 |
@chrisn @ashimura is there still a need to have a special homepage for this IG? Looking at the current homepage, it seems outdated (still using the Ubiquitous domain) and doesn't add information compared to the default homepage. You won't be able to customize it much but maintenance is a LOT easier. |
@chrisn , please use the W3C calendar to track IG meetings. At the moment, it's a guess game for outsiders to see where the IG meetings are announced, where past meetings happened, etc. If you need a walk around on how to use the calendar system, I'm happy to give you one. Update: actually, you do use the system. my apologizes. |
editorial:
|
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Draft Charter:
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
The draft charter above is still under discussion by the IG.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: