-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ig/wot] Web of Things Interest Group rechartering #440
Comments
Advance notice; https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2023OctDec/0063.html (Member-only) |
no comments or requests from APA. |
|
No comments or requests on the Security side |
no comment or request from i18n |
Thanks a lot, @ruoxiran @himorin @simoneonofri ! @himorin , I've fixed the draft Charter HTML based on your advice, and now it's a valid HTML as the validator results shows. Also I've added one line about the Charter extension for the rechartering process like the current extended Charter. @plehegar , is there any concern/comment from the Privacy viewpoint? |
PING abstained to review the charter, so it's fine to go ahead. |
Thanks a lot, @plehegar ! |
(TiLT approval has been requested, with a 3-month extension) |
In section 1., it is written as |
The introduction to PlugFest and Testing is much appreciated, please continue this excellent work. A few minor suggestions:
|
Thanks a lot, @himorin and @siusin ! I've just fixed the draft Charter accordingly. Please note I used not Charter URLs but WG page URLs for DID WG and SDW WG, because we use group page URLs within section 4.2 generally. |
One minor comment: Web and Automotive Business & Working Groups - We stopped our activities in this space so this should be dropped from the charter. You could replace |
Thanks a lot, @plehegar ! Just updated the draft Charter. Please see: https://www.w3.org/2024/04/wot-ig-2024.html#w3c-coordination |
history table should have additional one line to briefly describe this rechartering. |
Looks good |
Approved and announced |
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Draft Charter:
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: