Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Web Animations out of normative references #365

Closed
ewilligers opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Move Web Animations out of normative references #365

ewilligers opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ewilligers
Copy link
Contributor

[web-animations-1] should not appear in the normative references for SVG2.

@AmeliaBR
Copy link
Contributor

I think this was made normative because of the sections related to the interaction of Web Animations and Use-element shadow trees:

https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#UseAnimations
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#InterfaceShadowAnimation

@boggydigital boggydigital added this to the SVG 2.0 Recommendation milestone Jun 11, 2018
@boggydigital
Copy link
Contributor

Not blocking updated 2.0 CR publication - assigning 2.0 Recommendation milestone to clean this up before 2.0 REC

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

The Web Animations API [web-animations-1] and the SVG Animations specification [svg-animation] define non-CSS ways to animate attributes and styles on targetted elements without directly manipulating DOM properties (see the Animation appendix for details). User agents that implement those features must ensure that all animations that apply to an element in a referenced document subtree also apply to instances of that element in a use-element shadow tree, as described in this section.

Use of 'must' is clearly normative, although 'user agents that implement' makes it conditional.

This one can be closed, web animations is still used normatively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants