You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In SVG 1, BackgroundImage was used in tandem with enable-background to render part of SVG into a filter input buffer.
In SVG 2, there are no enable-background anymore (no one really supported it anyway) and the spec simply says:
This keyword represents the back drop defined by the current isolation group behind the filter region at the time that the filter element was invoked. See isolation property.
But the filter attribute always forces group isolation, meaning it the same as using SourceGraphic, no?
And browsers do not support it either. Chrome does handle BackgroundImage sometimes (probably simply fallbacks to SourceGraphic), but not BackgroundAlpha.
What is the difference between SourceGraphic and BackgroundImage in terms of SVG 2?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://www.w3.org/TR/filter-effects-1/#attr-valuedef-in-backgroundimage
In SVG 1,
BackgroundImage
was used in tandem withenable-background
to render part of SVG into a filter input buffer.In SVG 2, there are no
enable-background
anymore (no one really supported it anyway) and the spec simply says:But the
filter
attribute always forces group isolation, meaning it the same as usingSourceGraphic
, no?And browsers do not support it either. Chrome does handle
BackgroundImage
sometimes (probably simply fallbacks toSourceGraphic
), but notBackgroundAlpha
.What is the difference between
SourceGraphic
andBackgroundImage
in terms of SVG 2?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: